🔗 Share this article

Advocates of a private school system established to instruct Native Hawaiians describe a recent legal action targeting the enrollment procedures as a blatant effort to overlook the wishes of a royal figure who bequeathed her estate to secure a improved prospects for her population almost 140 years ago.

The Heritage of the Royal Benefactor

The Kamehameha schools were established via the bequest of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, the descendant of the founding monarch and the remaining lineage holder in the Kamehameha line. Upon her passing in 1884, the princess’s estate included approximately 9% of the Hawaiian islands' total acreage.

Her testament established the educational system utilizing those lands and property to fund them. Today, the system comprises three campuses for elementary through high school and 30 early learning centers that prioritize education rooted in Hawaiian traditions. The schools educate around 5,400 pupils across all grades and maintain an trust fund of roughly $15 bn, a sum greater than all but about 10 of the country’s premier colleges. The schools take zero funding from the U.S. treasury.

Selective Enrollment and Economic Assistance

Enrollment is highly competitive at each stage, with just approximately one in five applicants securing a place at the high school. Kamehameha schools additionally subsidize approximately 92% of the cost of teaching their students, with almost 80% of the enrolled students additionally getting various forms of financial aid based on need.

Historical Context and Cultural Significance

Jon Osorio, the head of the Hawaiʻinuiākea School of Hawaiian Knowledge at the UH, said the learning centers were established at a time when the Hawaiian people was still on the decline. In the 1880s, about 50,000 Native Hawaiians were thought to reside on the Hawaiian chain, down from a peak of from 300,000 to half a million individuals at the period of initial encounter with Europeans.

The native government was really in a unstable situation, specifically because the America was becoming ever more determined in obtaining a permanent base at Pearl Harbor.

The scholar stated during the 1900s, “nearly all native practices was being marginalized or even removed, or aggressively repressed”.

“At that time, the learning centers was truly the single resource that we had,” the academic, a graduate of the schools, commented. “The organization that we had, that was just for us, and had the ability at least of ensuring we kept pace with the general public.”

The Court Case

Currently, almost all of those admitted at the centers have Hawaiian descent. But the new suit, submitted in district court in Honolulu, claims that is unjust.

The case was filed by a group named Students for Fair Admissions, a conservative group located in the state that has for a long time pursued a court fight against race-conscious policies and ethnicity-focused enrollment. The group took legal action against the Ivy League university in 2014 and ultimately secured a precedent-setting high court decision in 2023 that resulted in the conservative supermajority end race-conscious admissions in higher education across the nation.

A digital portal established in the previous month as a forerunner to the legal challenge states that while it is a “outstanding learning institution”, the centers' “enrollment criteria expressly prefers students with Native Hawaiian ancestry rather than non-Native Hawaiian students”.

“In fact, that preference is so pronounced that it is essentially unfeasible for a student without Hawaiian ancestry to be accepted to Kamehameha,” Students for Fair Admission says. “We believe that emphasis on heritage, rather than merit or need, is neither fair nor legal, and we are dedicated to stopping Kamehameha’s unlawful admissions policies in court.”

Conservative Activism

The effort is spearheaded by Edward Blum, who has overseen groups that have submitted over twelve lawsuits questioning the use of race in education, commerce and in various organizations.

The activist declined to comment to journalistic inquiries. He told a different publication that while the organization endorsed the educational purpose, their offerings should be accessible to every resident, “not just those with a certain heritage”.

Academic Consequences

An assistant professor, an assistant professor at the graduate school of education at the prestigious institution, said the lawsuit challenging the educational institutions was a remarkable instance of how the battle to reverse historic equality laws and regulations to foster equal opportunity in schools had moved from the battleground of colleges and universities to K-12.

The expert noted activist entities had challenged the Ivy League school “quite deliberately” a decade ago.

In my view the challenge aims at the Kamehameha schools because they are a particularly distinct school… similar to the approach they selected Harvard quite deliberately.

The academic stated while affirmative action had its critics as a somewhat restricted instrument to increase academic chances and access, “it was an crucial resource in the toolbox”.

“It functioned as an element in this more extensive set of policies available to educational institutions to broaden enrollment and to build a more just education system,” the professor commented. “To lose that tool, it’s {incredibly harmful